Skip to main content
· 1/23/1986

Bailey v. Container Corp. of America

Citations

  • 660 F. Supp. 1048
  • 30 Ohio B. 146
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30159
  • 44 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,465
  • 57 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because liquidated damages under the ADEA are punitive in nature, a jury's award of state punitive damages and ADEA liquidated damages constitutes a double recovery and therefore reducing the total recovery by the amount of the liquidated damages award
  • liquidated damages on ADEA claim and punitive damages on pendent state law claim would constitute a double recovery for the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David S. Porter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.