Skip to main content
· 1/16/1991

Bailey v. City of National City

Citations

  • 226 Cal. App. 3d 1319
  • 277 Cal. Rptr. 427
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 839
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 569
  • 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 42

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that challenged rule regulates intimate, not expressive, association, and concluding that intimate association is outside the purview of the First Amendment and rather invokes liberty interests, rendering the overbreadth doctrine inapplicable
  • noting that challenged rule regulates intimate, not expressive, association, and concluding that intimate association is outside the purview of the First Amendment and rather invokes liberty interests, rendering the overbreadth doctrine inapplicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Froehlich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.