Bailey v. Cajun Insulation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Claimant’s testimony alone that he did not receive notice until weeks after it was pre sumed to have been mailed failed to rebut the presumption of when notice was mailed
• “The decision also contained the notation ‘Decision Mailed: 9/2/83’. This notation gives rise to a presumption that the notice was mailed on September 2, since public officials are presumed to have performed their duties correctly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).