Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 3/2/1998
Bailey v. Bailey
Citations
- 330 S.C. 326
- 498 S.E.2d 891
- 1998 S.C. App. LEXIS 33
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the family court had no jurisdiction to apportion property excluded by a post-marital agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cureton, Howard, Howell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-07-31· cited 46×
- Gilley v. GilleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-06-09· cited 21×
- Bunkum v. Manor PropertiesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-01-22· cited 20×
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-05-09· cited 10×
- Sims v. SimsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-09-22· cited 10×
- Peake v. PeakeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-03-07· cited 7×
- Chabek v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-10-29· cited 3×
- Lighty v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-05-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.