Skip to main content

Bailey v. Bailey

Citations

  • 954 P.2d 962
  • 1998 WL 78041

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding the district court’s decision to include an escalation clause in a parent’s income calculation because husband was a majority stockholder and in a position to control “phantom income” from his businesses
  • the district court abused its discretion by requiring the husband to pay the wife a large lump sum payment within 180 days from the date of the judgment without providing any alternative means of payment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taylor, C.J., and Thomas, MacY, Golden and Lehman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.