Baier v. State Farm Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that any recovery by attorney from insurer “would not violate the contract” between insured and insurer
• recognizing that any recovery by attorney from insurer \would not violate the contract\ between insured and insurer
• rejecting subrogee-insurer’s argument that application of the common fund doctrine would violate the subrogation contract between itself and the insured
• rejecting insurer’s argument that application of the common fund doctrine would violate the subrogation contract between insurer and its insured
• rejecting subrogee-insurer's argument that application of the common fund doctrine would violate the subrogation contract between itself and the insured
• the federal court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over the application of Illinois’ common fund doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).