· 3/9/2007
Bahrain Telecommunications Co. v. Discoverytel, Inc.
Citations
- 476 F. Supp. 2d 176
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16931
- 2007 WL 715926
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying state statutory limitations on issuance of provisional remedies in aid of arbitration
- inappropriate to order immediate disclosure of assets “merely because [the plaintiff] wishes to know whether it is worth its while to pursue the hearing that it has demanded”
- “A prejudgment remedy does not interfere with the arbitral process but merely ensures that there will be assets available to satisfy any judgment the arbitrators themselves may render.”
- “Rule 64 thus authorizes a federal court to borrow relevant state law on provisional remedies. And although the federal rules govern the conduct of the action in federal court, state law determines when and how a provisional remedy is obtained.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kravitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.