Skip to main content
· 3/9/2007

Bahrain Telecommunications Co. v. Discoverytel, Inc.

Citations

  • 476 F. Supp. 2d 176
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16931
  • 2007 WL 715926

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying state statutory limitations on issuance of provisional remedies in aid of arbitration
  • inappropriate to order immediate disclosure of assets “merely because [the plaintiff] wishes to know whether it is worth its while to pursue the hearing that it has demanded”
  • “A prejudgment remedy does not interfere with the arbitral process but merely ensures that there will be assets available to satisfy any judgment the arbitrators themselves may render.”
  • “Rule 64 thus authorizes a federal court to borrow relevant state law on provisional remedies. And although the federal rules govern the conduct of the action in federal court, state law determines when and how a provisional remedy is obtained.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kravitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.