Bahman Haftsavar v. All American Carpet and Rugs, Inc. and Twin City Fire Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “mixed question[s] of law and fact” are subject to “de novo” review
• holding that employer was not required to pay for employee’s heart surgery, the necessity for which was discovered as employee was preparing for surgery connected to his compensable work injury, but was not causally related to his work injury
• stating claimant “must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that disputed treatment was medically necessary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).