Bagwell v. Henson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The incorrect designation of the date of the judgment in the notice of appeal did not render the appeal subject to dismissal.
• in which this Court stated that the Rule “applies equally to real estate and personal property,” while construing an option to repurchase buildings and improvements on another’s land
• “in a contest between a prior unrecorded instrument based on a valuable consideration and a subsequent [recorded] voluntary conveyance, even in the absence of notice, the prior [unrecorded] instrument prevails”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).