Bagley v. Rowley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a party’s displeasure with legal rulings does not form an adequate basis for recusal”
• repeating that disagreement with legal rulings “does not form an adequate basis for recusal”
• finding no abuse of discretion on review of a denial of a recusal motion and stating “a party’s displeasure with legal rulings does not form an adequate basis for recusal”
• “We have repeatedly stated that a party’s displeasure with legal rulings does not form an adequate basis for recusal . . . .”
• “We have repeatedly stated that a party’s displeasure with legal rulings does not form an adequate basis for recusal . . . .”
• “We have repeatedly stated that a party’s displeasure with legal rulings does not form an adequate basis for recusal . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).