Skip to main content

Baggett v. State

Citations

  • 421 S.W.2d 629
  • 220 Tenn. 592
  • 24 McCanless 592
  • 1967 Tenn. LEXIS 442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although trial courts generally enjoy discretion regarding the admissibility of evidence, such discretion is not absolute and may be overturned on appeal if arbitrarily exercised
  • stating that “an accused may not successfully plead involuntary intoxication because he drank at the request or suggestion of another . . . or because he drank to relieve physical pain, or from an uncontrollable desire caused by long indulgence of the appetite” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Humphreys

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.