Baggett v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in a fraudulent concealment case where the plaintiff is alleging “a failure to act,” less specificity in pleading is required because “the plaintiff cannot point out the specific moment when the defendant failed to act”
• “Under California law, the elements of unjust 5 enrichment are: (1) receipt of a benefit; and (2) unjust retention of the benefit at the expense of 6 another.” (citing Lectrodryer v. SeoulBank, 77 Cal. App. 4th 723, 726 (2000))
• “To show that information is material, a plaintiff must demonstrate that ‘had the omitted 13 information been disclosed,’ the reasonable consumer would have ‘been aware of it and behaved 14 differently.’” (quoting Mirkin v. Wasserman, 5 Cal. 4th 1082, 1093 (1993)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).