Baggett v. Dugger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting courts’ refusals “to treat a bill of par ticulars as a general investigative tool for the defense, or as a device to compel disclosure of the government’s evidence or its legal theory prior to trial”
• “[T]elephone records are clearly included under this rule as discoverable objects to which defendants are entitled.”
• defendant provided with discovery of affidavits submitted in support of wiretap application to permit him to challenge validity of wiretap order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).