Skip to main content
· 7/19/2006

Baez v. Wagner & Hunt, P.A.

Citations

  • 442 F. Supp. 2d 1273
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58972
  • 2006 WL 2294858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Whether a . . . letter that requires a consumer to dispute a debt in writing violates the FDCPA is a question of first impression in this Circuit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.