Baez v. Jetblue Airways

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although “allegations of providing false information to the police . . . do not suffice for an HED claim,” such false reports may support a claim where, like here, there was “additional outrageous behavior’
• ordering “limited discovery” on whether the defendant “had timely informal notice of [the plaintiff’s claims and whether [the defendant] was prejudiced”
• “[P]roviding false information to the police does not make a private individual . . . a state actor and liable under § 1983.”
• “[P]roviding false information to the police does not make a private individual . . . a state actor and liable under § 1983.”
• dismissing claims because “providing false information to the police does not make a private individual . . . a state actor and liable under § 1983”
• “‘[A]llegations of providing false information to the police do not suffice’ for an IIED claim absent additional outrageous behavior.” (citation and alteration omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).