Baez v. Goodrich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[t]hese three theories evolved out of the unique context in which plaintiffs bring Establishment Clause claims”
• stating that “direct exposure standing” can occur where “a plaintiff is personally confronted with a government-sponsored religious expression that directly touches the plaintiff’s religious or non-religious sensibilities”
• declining to find standing based on a direct exposure theory where students alleged that they were “deprived of educational services because public funds, which otherwise would have been available to them, were diverted to” religious institutions
• “Article III.of the United States.Consti tution limits the jurisdiction of federal courts to 'Cases’ or 'Controversies.' U.S. Const, art. Ill, § 2.”
• “We do not consider this allegation, which appears for the first time in the[] brief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).