Baer v. J.D. Donovan, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that recovery for risk of malfunction of remaining kidney was \generous but not excessive\ because it was \fair comment with respect to the implications of * * * being left with only one kidney\
• noting that MHRA does not provide general definition of “aggrieved party,” one requirement of being considered “prevailing party,” but MHRA specifically defines “aggrieved party” for purposes of employment application discrimination cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).