Baer v. Baer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a mother’s attempt to deceive the father as to where she and the parties’ children were to be moving had no significance in the family court’s child custody determination because it in no way harmed the children
• finding no evidence to show that mother’s sudden marriage substantially affected the welfare of the children
• finding mother’s marriage to her paramour reinstated her moral fitness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shirley v. Shirley
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-31· cited 63×
• Henggeler v. Hanson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-12-14· cited 17×
• Pountain v. Pountain
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-06-08· cited 14×
• Hollar v. Hollar
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-24· cited 14×
• Moeller v. Moeller
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-10· cited 6×
• Ewing v. Baumrind
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-11-07· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davenport v. Davenport
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-12-01· cited 64×
• Stutz v. Funderburk
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-01-22· cited 24×
• Pullen v. Pullen
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-08-18· cited 21×
• Barden v. Barden
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-03-16· cited 12×
• Heckle v. Heckle
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-03-01· cited 7×