Baer v. Arkison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a] small number of initial omissions may not warrant denial of discharge, where there is no evidence of intent to defraud, or no pattern of omission”
• “Omissions from bankruptcy schedules and statement of financial affairs constitute a false oath for purposes of section 727(a)(4)(A).”
• debtor’s motion to voluntarily dismiss case denied for same reasons he was denied his discharge
• “In itself, using a business account to pay personal expenses is not a basis to deny a Chapter 7 debtor his discharge. But falsely underreporting the amount of business funds used for personal expenses will support a claim under §727(a)(4)(A).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).