Badia v. City of Casa Grande

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the standard is “wanton misconduct that is flagrant and evinces a 13 LEATHAM et al. v. YEARICK et al. Decision of the Court lawless and destructive spirit[]”
• “Sheer speculation is insufficient to establish the necessary element of proximate cause or to defeat summary judgment.”
• \Sheer speculation is insufficient . . . to defeat summary judgment.\
• \Sheer speculation is insufficient to . . . defeat summary judgment.\
• “Sheer speculation is insufficient . . . to defeat summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).