Badgett v. Federal Express Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Plaintiff’s Section 1981 claim is barred as untimely due to the six-month contractual limitations period
• concluding that the plaintiff's state law claims and non-EEOC federal claims were subject to dismissal as time-bared under the six-month contractual limitation period agreed to by the parties
• holding a contractual limitation for the time to bring an emotional distress claim valid under federal and North Carolina law
• declining to follow Lewis and relying on Fink to conclude that contractual limitations on the bringing of FMLA claims are valid
• enforcing a contractual limitations period that shortened the FMLA statute of limitations
• retaliation for exercising FMLA rights claim barred under contractually shortened limitations period of 6 months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).