Badger Pharmacal, Inc., D/B/A Wisconsin Pharmacal Company, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Company and Softsoap Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Colgate’s representations about future marketing plans were “promissory in nature, reflecting Colgate’s future intent”
• inferring intent to appeal final judgment where the notice dated the judgment incorrectly but described an intent to appeal the order “granting defendants judgment [and] dismissing plaintiff’s complaint”
• inferring intent to appeal final judgment where the notice dated the judgment incorrectly but described an intent to appeal the order “granting defendants judgment [and] dismissing plaintiff’s complaint”
• inferring intent to appeal final judgment where the notice dated the judgment incorrectly but described an intent to appeal the order “granting defendants judgment [and] dismissing plaintiff’s complaint”
• inferring intent to appeal final judgment where the notice dated the judgment incorrectly but described an intent to appeal the order “granting defendants judgment [and] dismissing plaintiff’s complaint”
• inferring intent to appeal final judgment where the notice dated the judgment incorrectly but described an intent to appeal the order “granting defendants judgment [and] dismissing plaintiff’s complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).