Bader v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a court may consider the contents of a document “[w]here a plaintiff has relied on the terms and effect of a document in drafting the complaint, and that document is thus integral to the complaint . . . .”
• “a contract cannot be implied in fact where . . . there is an express contract covering the subject matter involved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).