Bader v. Northern Line Layers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking this approach despite opining that subpart (6) may not actually apply to small groups of construction workers and project managers working at sites across the country
• analyzing construction project sites and holding that they could not be aggregated together under Subparts 3 and 4 because plaintiffs failed to provide facts demonstrating that the construction sites were geographically proximate to each other
• discussing whether there is 17 an issue of fact as to whether outstationed employees should be counted toward termination totals 18 to determine whether a plant closing or mass layoff occurred at a “single site of employment”
• “The term [outstationed] most logically connotes a situation where employees live for a short period of time at a certain site, departing for home when the work is done.”
• “The term [outstationed] most logically connotes a situation where employees live for a short period of time at a certain site, departing for home when the work is done.”
• “The [Department of Labor’s] comments explain that its regulation was intended to apply to ‘mobile workers,’ including ‘outstationed workers and traveling workers who report to but do not work out of a particular office.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).