Bacot v. Fessenden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that to avoid estoppel, “an insurer need not be the one to have filed the action in which it seeks a declaration of no coverage”
• noting that to avoid estoppel, “an insurer need not be the one to have filed the action in which it seeks a declaration of no coverage”
• “This Court agrees with these decisions . . . that the proper inquiry is whether Sentinel sought a declaratory judgment of no coverage within a reasonable time.”
• “This Court agrees with these decisions . . . that the proper inquiry is whether Sentinel sought a declaratory judgment of no coverage within a reasonable time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).