Skip to main content
· 7/1/1840

Bacon v. Stark

Citations

  • 2 F. Cas. 325
  • 2 Sawy. 644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that issues abandoned in the district court will not be considered on appeal
  • holding that seven-, nine-, and ten-member classes did not satisfy numerosity requirement
  • noting that “we do not ordinarily con- sider on appeal issues not raised below”
  • noting that “we do not ordinarily consider on appeal issues not raised below”
  • “[W]e 4 do not ordinarily consider on appeal issues not raised below.”
  • “[W]e do not ordinarily consider on appeal issues not raised below.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.