· 7/1/1840
Bacon v. Stark
Citations
- 2 F. Cas. 325
- 2 Sawy. 644
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that issues abandoned in the district court will not be considered on appeal
- holding that seven-, nine-, and ten-member classes did not satisfy numerosity requirement
- noting that “we do not ordinarily con- sider on appeal issues not raised below”
- noting that “we do not ordinarily consider on appeal issues not raised below”
- “[W]e 4 do not ordinarily consider on appeal issues not raised below.”
- “[W]e do not ordinarily consider on appeal issues not raised below.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.