Skip to main content
· 10/29/1902

Bacome v. Black

Citations

  • 7 Cal. Unrep. 34
  • 70 P. 620
  • 1902 Cal. LEXIS 917

Syllabus

<p>Honey Lent.—In an Action to Recover Money Loaned, a Finding that the money was loaned defendant and another jointly, and that defendant promised to repay the same, is not inconsistent, so as to be insufficient to support a judgment for plaintiff.</p> <p>Money Lent—Evidence.—In an Action for Money Loaned, it was contended by defendant that the credit was given and the money loaned another. Plaintiff showed the loan was brought about by the other, but that defendant got the money to assist him in purchasing a newspaper route. Held, not prejudicial error to admit testimony that on the following day plaintiff loaned defendant a sum to make up the amount necessary to purchase the route.</p>

Judges: Chipman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.