Backsman v. Courtesy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing IIED claim to survive dismissal based on allegation that defendant employer continued to engage in discriminatory, retaliatory, and hostile behavior toward plaintiff despite knowledge of plaintiff’s “expected reaction to wrongful treatment”
• allowing IIED claim to survive dismissal based on allegation that defendant employer continued to engage in discriminatory, retaliatory, and hostile behavior toward plaintiff despite knowledge of plaintiff’s “expected reaction to wrongful treatment”
• allowing IIED claim to survive dismissal based on allegation that defendant employer continued to engage in discriminatory, retaliatory, and hostile behavior toward plaintiff despite knowledge of plaintiff’s “expected reaction to wrongful treatment”
• allowing IIED claim to survive dismissal based on allegation that defendant employer continued to engage in discriminatory, retaliatory, and hostile behavior toward plaintiff despite knowledge of plaintiff’s “expected reaction to wrongful treatment”
• allowing IIED claim to survive dismissal based on allegation that defendant employer continued to engage in discriminatory, retaliatory, and hostile behavior toward plaintiff despite knowledge of plaintiff’s “expected reaction to wrongful treatment”
• “Because the [MFEPA] is the state law analogue of Title VII, interpretation of [plaintiff’s] claim under [MFEPA] is guided by federal cases interpreting Title VII.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).