· 6/8/1982
Backman v. Polaroid Corp.
Citations
- 540 F. Supp. 667
- 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12838
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to dismiss insider trading claim based on sale of common stock and contemporaneous purchase on the open market of call options
- “The privity requirement announced by the Sixth Circuit in Fridrich places a burden upon plaintiffs in insider trading cases which is nearly impossible to meet.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McNAUGHT
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.