Back Bay Spas, Inc. v. 441 Stuart Marketing, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “legal theories not raised squarely in the lower court cannot be broached for the first time on appeal”
• reasoning that a requirement in the mortgage documents that the lender consent to future transactions was enforceable as to the lessee who was not a party to the mortgage where the lessee had constructive notice of the consent requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).