Skip to main content
· 3/19/1892

Bachmann v. Supreme Lodge Knights & Ladies of Honor

Citations

  • 44 Ill. App. 188
  • 1892 Ill. App. LEXIS 560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that state constitution requires the state “to prove that a defendant knows the password to decrypt an electronic device beyond a reason- able doubt for the foregone conclusion doctrine to apply”
  • explaining that the Massachusetts Constitution “requires the Commonwealth to prove that a defendant knows the password to decrypt an electronic device beyond a reasonable doubt for the foregone conclusion exception to apply”
  • remanding for entry of order compelling defendant to enter password into cell phone for which Commonwealth had search warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waterman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.