· 4/24/2001
Bachman v. Commercial Financial Services, Inc.
Citations
- 246 F.3d 1291
- 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2036
- 26 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1087
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 7427
- 37 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 227
- 2001 WL 417261
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Amarex “sets out this circuit’s definitive procedure for determining all administrative expense claims....”
- distinguishing severance pay in lieu of notice plans from one similar to Mason’s on the ground that the former “was clearly a component of compensation”
- noting that employees received full compensation for their post-petition services
- noting that employees received full compensation for their post-petition services
- applying § 503(b)'s 18 \actual and necessary\ test to executives' lump-sum severance 19 claims
- applying § 503(b)'s 18 \actual and necessary\ test to executives' lump-sum severance 19 claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henry, Briscoe, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.