Skip to main content
· 4/24/2001

Bachman v. Commercial Financial Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 246 F.3d 1291
  • 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2036
  • 26 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1087
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 7427
  • 37 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 227
  • 2001 WL 417261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Amarex “sets out this circuit’s definitive procedure for determining all administrative expense claims....”
  • distinguishing severance pay in lieu of notice plans from one similar to Mason’s on the ground that the former “was clearly a component of compensation”
  • noting that employees received full compensation for their post-petition services
  • noting that employees received full compensation for their post-petition services
  • applying § 503(b)'s 18 \actual and necessary\ test to executives' lump-sum severance 19 claims
  • applying § 503(b)'s 18 \actual and necessary\ test to executives' lump-sum severance 19 claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry, Briscoe, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.