Bachman v. American Society of Clinical Pathologists

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “I conclude that the Rehabilitation Act was not intended to cover tax-exempt institutions absent any further affirmative federal financial assistance.”
• “[T]he Rehabilitation Act was not intended to cover tax-exempt institutions absent any further affirmative federal financial assistance.”
• recipients of federal financial assistance are liable for violations of the Rehabilitation Act which occur during the time that they are recipients of federal financial assistance
• compliance with Rehabilitation Act is for the period which federal financial assistance is extended
• “The term ‘assistance’ connotes a transfer of government funds by way of subsidy.”
• monetary damages were available under Title VI

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).