Bache v. American Telephone & Telegraph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that sec. 455(b)(3) does not mandate recusal \absent a specific showing that that judge was previously involved with a case while in the U.S. Attorney’s Office.\
• declining to require recusal of district court judge based on her former service as a Supervisory Assistant United States Attorney, \absent a specific showing that th[e] judge was previously involved with [the defendant's] case while in the U.S. Attorney's office\
• judge is not required to recuse himself or herself from cases tried by U.S. Attorney’s Office if not previously involved in case while employed with office
• judge is not required to recuse himself or herself from cases tried by U.S. Attorney’s Office if not previously involved in case while employed with office
• recusal not required absent specific showing judge involved in previous case
• “[A]bsent a specific showing that that judge was previously involved with a case while in the U.S. Attorney’s office that he or she is later assigned to preside over as a judge, § 455(b)(3) does not mandate recusal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).