E.D. Wisconsin· 1/13/1982
Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc. v. Moebius
Citations
- 531 F. Supp. 75
- 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10485
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting plaintiff's argument that the arbitration provision was unenforceable because it violated § 788.01
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Myron L. Gordon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hagstrom v. BreutmanN.D. Illinois· 1983-10-03· cited 31×
- Natalie KROOG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven MAIT and Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Defendants-AppellantsSeventh Circuit· 1983-07-15· cited 26×
- Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp.S.D. New York· 1983-02-15· cited 24×
- Klein Sleep Products, Inc. v. Hillside Bedding Co.S.D. New York· 1982-10-12· cited 8×
- Dain Bosworth Inc. v. BrandhorstCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1984-09-06· cited 7×
- Marley v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.N.D. Texas· 1983-07-07· cited 5×
- In Re the Arbitration Between Sharp Electronics Corp. & Branded Products, Inc.S.D. New York· 1984-12-05· cited 3×
- Nevill v. Johnson Controls Int'l PLCE.D. Wisconsin· 2019-01-23· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Merritt Dickstein v. Edmond Dupont, as They Are Partners of Francis I. Dupont & Co.First Circuit· 1971-06-02· cited 153×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,309 Clarance B. Dickinson, a v. Heinold Securities, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1981-10-06· cited 147×
- The Anaconda v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court· 1944-04-24· cited 118×
- Barron v. Tastee Freez International, Inc.E.D. Wisconsin· 1980-01-25· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.