Bach v. Rothensies

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where no “governing statute or a regulation . . . required the agency to afford interested parties an opportunity to submit comments,” it is up to an “agency’s discretion” whether to accept or consider such comments
• declining to review military’s decisions about base closures and realignments given that “the primary factors driving the . . . decision are national defense, the adequacy of the merchant marine, foreign policy, and the national interest”
• habeas petitioner not entitled to a hearing under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).