Bach v. Little

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting O'Neil limited a defendant's liability for third party components but did not eliminate the possibility of such liability
• rejecting defendant’s government contractor defense where “absent from [d]efendant’s evidence [was] any reasonably precise specification requiring the use of asbestos[]”
• noting O'Neil limited a defendant's liability for third party components but did not eliminate the possibility of such liability
• “While O’Neil limited a defendant’s liability for third-party components, it did not eliminate the possibility.”
• “In Wilson, the Ninth Circuit rejected a broad obligation to disclose all material facts, but accepted that a manufacturer would be ‘bound to disclose’ a defect that posed safety concerns or risk of physical injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).