Skip to main content
· 2/16/2011

Baccei v. United States

Citations

  • 632 F.3d 1140
  • 107 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 898
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3005
  • 2011 WL 540702

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that we do not generally consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal
  • holding that we do not generally consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal
  • holding that “even if the IRS were negligent in failing to notify [plaintiff], negligence alone will not support a claim of equitable estoppel against the government”
  • “Absent exceptional circumstances, we generally will not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal, although we have discretion to do so.”
  • “[W]e will not reframe an appeal to review what would be in effect a different case than the one decided by the district court.”
  • “Absent exceptional circumstances, we generally will not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard C. Tallman and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges, and Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.