Bacardi International Limited v. v. Suarez & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Fed. R. Civ. P. 19(a)(1)(B)(i) is “concerned with protecting the interests of the absent party”
• noting that “[t]he mere fact, however, that Party A, in a suit against Party B, intends to introduce evidence that will indicate that a non-party, C, behaved improperly does not, by itself, make C a necessary party”
• finding complete relief available even though a dispute with an absent party might be left unresolved
• affirming a stay for “more than simple parallel litigation,” but because the state proceeding involved the same issues and parties, the state proceeding was filed first, and already well underway
• affirming a stay for “more than simple parallel litigation,” but because the state proceeding involved the same issues and parties, the state proceeding was filed first, and already well underway
• “The confirmation of an arbitration award finalizes the award and makes the award a judgment of the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).