Baca v. Complete Drywall Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 17 that “a worker was entitled to [PPD] benefits instead of scheduled injury benefits if 18 the worker could show that the injury to the scheduled member caused a separate and 19 distinct injury to a non-scheduled body part” (emphasis added)
• “Impairment includes physical impairment, primary mental impairment and secondary mental impairment[.]”
• “Impairment includes physical impairment, primary mental impairment and secondary mental impairment[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).