Skip to main content

Baca v. Baca

Citations

  • 568 S.E.2d 746
  • 256 Ga. App. 514
  • 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 1908
  • 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 856

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that multiple issues raised in an appeal from an expired protective order were not moot because they were capable of repetition, yet evaded review
  • issues stemming from an expired six-month protective order were not moot, where issues were capable of repetition and evade review
  • “mootness is a mandatory ground for dismissal”
  • mootness is a mandatory ground for dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruffin, Pope, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.