District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/6/1976
Babson Bros. Co. v. Allison
Citations
- 337 So. 2d 848
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a controlling stockholder of a corporation is privileged to interfere with a contract between the corporation and a third party
- holding that employee of one family-owned corporation who was assigned to terminate a contract of another corporation owned by the same family could not, as a matter of law, be held liable for tortious interference with the contract
- “It is clear that a controlling stockholder of a corporation falls within the privilege when he interferes with a contract between the corporation and a third person.”
- “It is clear that a controlling stockholder of a corporation falls within the privilege when he interferes with a contract between the corporation and a third person.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McCord
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Johnson Enterprises of Jacksonville, Inc. v. FPL Group, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1998-12-18· cited 270×
- Ethyl Corp. v. BalterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-07-08· cited 128×
- McCurdy v. CollisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-11· cited 65×
- Ins. Field Services v. White & White InspectionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-06-11· cited 58×
- Bendix Corp. v. AdamsAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-03-14· cited 42×
- Heavener, Ogier Services, Inc. v. RW Fla. RegionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-08-04· cited 38×
- Symons Corp. v. Tartan-Lavers Delray BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-26· cited 33×
- Texas West Oil and Gas Corp. v. FitzgeraldWyoming Supreme Court· 1986-10-21· cited 29×
- Nitzberg v. ZaleskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-04-03· cited 26×
- Peacock v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-06· cited 19×
- International Sales & Service, Inc. v. Austral Insulated Products, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2001-07-30· cited 18×
- Serafino v. Palm Terrace Apartments, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-12-01· cited 14×
- PENINSULA FEDERAL S & L ASS'N v. DKH Properties, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-06· cited 7×
- VOLVO AERO LEASING, LLC v. VAS AERO SERVICES, LLC f/k/a VOLVO AERO SERVICES, CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-03-13· cited 2×
- Johnson v. Telesat CablevisionEleventh Circuit· 1998-12-18
- Int'l Sales & Service Inc. v. Austral Insulated PrEleventh Circuit· 2001-07-30
- Crossland Inv. Co., Inc. v. RhodesN.D. Florida· 2003-02-28
- West Point Construction Co. v. Helms, (Edd), Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-07
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Felsen v. Sol Cafe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1969-05-15· cited 88×
- Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1940-04-19· cited 76×
- Pierce Ford Sales, Inc., and Elmer W. Bemis, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Ford Motor CompanySecond Circuit· 1962-02-05· cited 39×
- International Expositions, Inc. v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-03-06· cited 28×
- Rhine v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1959-07-14· cited 22×
- Economic Research Analysts, Inc. v. BrennanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-02-25· cited 10×
- Covert v. Terri Aviation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-03-21· cited 9×
- Babson Bros. Co. v. AllisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-07-16· cited 7×
- DeLaughter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-10-01· cited 1×
Other cases named Babson Bros. Co. v. Allison
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.