Babb v. Gentry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “in CAFA cases, the removal clocks of 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b
• “This approach also avoids courts expending copious time determining what a defendant should have known or have been able to ascertain at the time of the initial pleading [or other relevant filing].” (alteration in original) (quotation marks omitted)
• CAFA is codified in part at 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).