Skip to main content
· 7/24/1953

B. W. & Leo Harris Co. v. City of Hastings

Citations

  • 240 Minn. 44
  • 59 N.W.2d 813
  • 1953 Minn. LEXIS 674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that defendant’s claim was one “of adverse possession”
  • noting that defendant's claim was one \of adverse possession\
  • examining the language and structure of a statute to determine that a time limit on providing notice before commencing an action affecting title to real estate was not a procedural device but operated to absolutely bar the claim
  • city’s claim to tract of land based on claim of adverse possession barred by the act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christianson, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.