B. Sanfield, Inc. v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• competitor sued jewelry retailer for deceptive advertising but court on remand ultimately found no damages
• plaintiff must show that statement is “misleading in context, as demonstrated by actual consumer confusion
• “Where the plaintiff brings suit as a consumer, she will therefore have to show that she was in fact deceived in order to establish injury.”
• plaintiff must show that 14 Nos. 19-2581 & 19-2741 statement is “misleading in context, as demon- strated by actual consumer confusion
• plaintiff must show that 14 Nos. 19-2581 & 19-2741 statement is “misleading in context, as demon- strated by actual consumer confusion
• “where the statement is literally true or ambiguous, then the plaintiff is obliged to prove that the statement is misleading in context, as demonstrated by actual consumer confusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).