Skip to main content
· 3/22/2024

B. P. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that continuing to hold a detainee in handcuffs after a residence has been secured when there were sufficient officers present to maintain security was unreasonable
  • explaining that courts must “look to whatever specific factors may be appropriate in a particular case, whether or not listed in Graham”
  • examining the reasonableness of an seizure during the execution of a search warrant, not prior to securing a warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.