B. P. O. E. Lodge No. 2043 v. Ingraham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting amicus curiae’s due process claims that forcing them to compete with non-resident firefighter candidates would reduce their chances of being hired
• finding disparate impact based on a comparison of the percentage of African-Americans in Harrison’s public uniformed positions with that in its private workforce
• including the following partial citation: “Berry v. Doles, 438 U.S. 190, 202 (1978) (Rehnquist, J., dissenting) (amicus curiae has no standing to request relief not requested by the parties”)
• “[Residency requirements imposed by other municipalities ... were appropriately excluded from the district court’s definition of the relevant labor market.”
• determining relevant “labor market” in Title VII case
• determining relevant “labor market” in Title VII case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).