· 5/24/1978
B. & M. MACHINE CO. v. Avionic Enterprises, Inc.
Citations
- 566 S.W.2d 901
- 21 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 396
- 1978 Tex. LEXIS 355
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that subsequent judgment made during the trial court’s plenary power “in effect, vacated the first judgment”
- stating that subsequent judgment made during the trial court’s plenary power “in effect, vacated the first judgment”
- “[T]he second judgment reformed and, in effect, vacated the first judgment.”
- “[T]he second judgment reformed and, in effect, vacated the first judgment.”
- “[T]he second judgment reformed and, in effect, vacated the first judgment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.