Skip to main content
· 5/24/1978

B. & M. MACHINE CO. v. Avionic Enterprises, Inc.

Citations

  • 566 S.W.2d 901
  • 21 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 396
  • 1978 Tex. LEXIS 355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that subsequent judgment made during the trial court’s plenary power “in effect, vacated the first judgment”
  • stating that subsequent judgment made during the trial court’s plenary power “in effect, vacated the first judgment”
  • “[T]he second judgment reformed and, in effect, vacated the first judgment.”
  • “[T]he second judgment reformed and, in effect, vacated the first judgment.”
  • “[T]he second judgment reformed and, in effect, vacated the first judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.