· 3/9/1988
B & M DIE CO. v. Ford Motor Co.
Citations
- 421 N.W.2d 620
- 167 Mich. App. 176
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- unjust enrichment claim requires proof of benefit by defendant to plaintiff which is inequitable
- “The essential elements of such a claim [for unjust enrichment] are (1) receipt of a benefit by the defendant from the plaintiff, and (2) which benefit it is inequitable that the defendant retain.”
- “As Ford indicates, plaintiffs technical information was not a ‘trade secret’ under Michigan law. However, the jury could properly consider under a claim of unjust enrichment the value of the benefit received by Ford as a result of having this technical information.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan, Cynar, Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.