Skip to main content
· 3/18/1968

B. L. Suhl v. United States

Citations

  • 390 F.2d 547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • testimony of accomplice sufficient even though inconsistent with only evidence connecting defendant with offense
  • prosecution for mail fraud and other charges related to a check kiting scheme

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Duniway, Byrne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.